Rare defects
Important classes have few or no useful images.
A real problem. The right specialists.
Good parts are common, real defects are rare. We assess whether targeted data collection, anomaly detection or synthetic defect images can support your inspection project.
Your starting point
Important classes have few or no useful images.
Variants, illumination or actual production conditions are missing.
Development and evaluation use the same or very similar images.
The inspection principle
Match the approach to the data and defect task.
Schematic principle, not to scale. The drawings explain the inspection task; performance must be validated on real components.
A practical technical start
The defect task and honest evaluation on held-out real images are decisive.
What happens next
A short description is enough to begin. Add photos or requirements if available.
CorDev clarifies open questions with you and identifies the support your task needs.
We agree the involvement of suitable specialists with you. Testing or a pilot requires a separate agreement.
Your inspection task
Describe what you observe and what you want to achieve. You do not need to know the right technology yet.

TopicToo few defect images for AI inspection
Initially free and non-binding. No account required.
Before you ask
There is no universal minimum. Defects, variation, image quality and the method determine the need.
They can support development. Their benefit must be demonstrated on independently captured real good and defective images.
Some anomaly approaches support this. Representative good images and real defect examples remain important for evaluating relevant failures.
No. Paid work requires a separate, express agreement.